Harvested marijuana is trimmed at a Denver cultivation facility in February 2013. (Kathryn Scott Osler, Denver Post file)

City of Denver changing how it polices pesticide use on marijuana

City will not test marijuana for pesticides, but will hand products over to the state

More than a year after Denver started actively policing the marijuana industry’s use of pesticides, the city’s health department is changing its enforcement procedures.

Starting April 15, the Denver Department of Environmental Health will no longer test marijuana and pot products in a privately owned cannabis testing facility, the city wrote in an industry bulletin e-mailed on Friday. Instead it will place marijuana products suspected of being contaminated with banned pesticides on hold, notify the state agencies that have picked up the recall process initially started by DEH and possibly order the plants or products to be destroyed, the bulletin said.

City of Denver changing how it polices pesticide use on marijuana
Peter Perrone, center, is the lab director at Gobi Analytical, the Wheat Ridge cannabis testing lab used by the city of Denver. (Denver Post file)

“We’re taking a different approach here that’s more in line with other regulated industries,” said DEH executive director Bob McDonald. “It’s always been an option for us to condemn product. That authority has always been there. But we’ve given the industry more than a year now to learn what the public health issues are. And we need to transition into more sustainable and consistent enforcement.

“This idea of testing product until it’s deemed safe was never meant to be a long-term solution for this public health issue.”

The city’s pesticide-testing regimen has been the basis of the 20 marijuana recalls issued by Denver and at least six of the 14 recalls later issued by the state’s Marijuana Enforcement Division. The city’s controversial lab tests for pesticide residues, conducted by a Wheat Ridge cannabis lab when none in Colorado had yet been certified by the state’s health department, have been called into question by multiple companies undergoing recalls and maintaining their products’ compliance.

EdiPure, one of Colorado’s largest producers of cannabis-infused edibles, was the subject of four city-level recalls between October and December 2015. The company publicly questioned the lab tests conducted by the city’s partner lab Gobi Analytical and is now appealing the recalls to the city’s Board of Environmental Health.

“EdiPure welcomes the clarity from DEH today regarding their enforcement of pesticides on cannabis,” said Kyle Forti, an EdiPure spokesman.

But others in the industry are questioning how Denver will quantify pesticide contamination in the absence of testing.

“How does this get objectively measured?” asked Mark Slaugh, CEO of compliance outfit iComply and executive director of the Cannabis Business Alliance. “What is ‘potentially contaminated’? This could have a negative side.”

DEH’s McDonald said his agency’s investigations will involve interviews, spot checks, analysis of cultivation spray logs and more.

“Given the detailed investigations we do and information we collect, I’m confident that the decisions we make moving forward in the absence of testing will be solid decisions based on very detailed investigations,” McDonald said.

Denver officials say today’s marijuana is cleaner than it was when these enforcement actions first began in 2015.

“We’re in a higher state of compliance than where we were a year ago, even if there’s no way of quantifying that,” said Dan Rowland, communications director at the city’s Office of Marijuana Policy. “This issue is out there, and people understand the critical public health implications associated with it.”

Ricardo Baca: 303-954-1394, rbaca@denverpost.com or @bruvs


Watch EdiPure chief science officer Malcolm Morrison on The Cannabist Show

Subscribe to The Cannabist Show podcast:

Subscribe with iTunes

Subscribe with Pocket Casts

Subscribe with Stitcher

Subscribe on Google Play Music

Subscribe via RSS

This story was first published on DenverPost.com